Reading Time: 3 minutes
Newly released transcripts are shedding fresh light on the events surrounding the first impeachment of President Donald Trump, raising serious questions about how the investigation was handled. The revelations are reigniting concerns about transparency, bias, and accountability within the intelligence community.
Who is praying on the wall?
From The Federalist:
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (“HPSCI”) released two transcripts Monday morning from the 2019 closed-door interviews of the then-Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, Michael Atkinson. The just-released transcripts reveal new details behind the scheming that led to the first impeachment of Donald Trump.
That first impeachment trial focused on President Trump’s July 25, 2019 telephone conversation with the president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky. After the call, a supposed-whistleblower — more on that shortly — filed a complaint with the inspector general’s office on August 12, 2019, charging that Trump sought Zelensky’s assistance in investigating the Bidens to interfere in the 2020 election.
The Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel, however, concluded the Intelligence Community’s inspector general lacked jurisdiction to investigate the complaint because the call between the respective presidents did not involve the intelligence community. IG Atkinson responded by sending HPSCI a letter on September 9, 2019, alerting the House Committee to the “whistleblower” complaint and the fact that the Acting Director of National Intelligence had not forwarded the complaint to Congress, as purportedly required by statute.
These newly released transcripts raise significant concerns about how the impeachment narrative was formed. According to the testimony, the so-called whistleblower did not have firsthand knowledge of the call, but instead relied on another individual who listened in real time. Despite this, the complaint was still treated as credible without directly interviewing that key witness.
Even more concerning, Inspector General Michael Atkinson acknowledged that he did not personally review the transcript of the call before determining the complaint was credible. When conclusions of this magnitude are reached without examining primary evidence, it raises serious questions about the integrity of the process and the standards being applied.
The transcripts also reveal that the whistleblower did not disclose prior contact with Democratic members of the House Intelligence Committee — something later confirmed publicly. This omission adds to growing concerns that political coordination may have influenced what was presented as an independent complaint.
Additionally, testimony indicates that after the Department of Justice concluded there was no wrongdoing, another FBI division sought access to investigative materials. This raises further concerns about inconsistency within federal agencies and whether political motivations continued to drive the investigation even after it had been formally closed.
These revelations matter because they impact the credibility of our institutions and the trust of the American people. Let’s pray, as The Federalist puts it, that those who conspired against the President would be held accountable, and that these revelations would “wake Americans up to how the deep state and a complicit media sought to thwart their electoral will.”
Leave a prayer below for our nation and its leaders — and share this article to encourage others to intercede for truth and justice.
(Excerpt from The Federalist. Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America – Donald Trump, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=52646574)
