<\/p>\n
Voter fraud is a real problem, especially in states like Minnesota, where scandals have become the norm. Though officials in Minnesota claim their electoral process is reliable and sound, the truth is that there are gaping holes in the framework currently in place.\n<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Investigative reporter James O\u2019Keefe and his \u201cJustice League\u201d crew recently went undercover at polling stations throughout Minneapolis on Minnesota Primary Day to poke holes in the lie that their voting guidelines are trustworthy. Their main goal was \u201cto put the state\u2019s voter vouching system to an extreme test.\u201d<\/em>\n<\/p>\n Currently, Minnesota Statutes \u00a7 201.061 stipulates that \u201ca voter who is already registered in a precinct can sign an oath stating that they personally know another individual is a resident of that precinct.\u201d Additionally, \u201ca voter who is registered to vote in the precinct may sign up to eight proof-of-residence oaths on any election day.\u201d\n<\/p>\n During the undercover operation, O\u2019Keefe and independent journalist Cam Higby visited various voting precincts. O\u2019Keefe dressed in traditional Muslim attire, while Higby posed as a woman in a burqa. Together, they presented various poll workers with a \u201cdeliberately extreme scenario involving multiple people who were supposedly unregistered.\u201d <\/em>\n<\/p>\n At one particular station, O\u2019Keefe, disguising his voice with an accent, asked poll workers if he could vouch for unregistered voters. \u201cAbout the vouching program, yeah? I can vouch for them? But they are not registered? That\u2019s ok? That\u2019s fine<\/em>?\u201d O\u2019Keefe inquired. Without hesitation, the workers answered, \u201cYeah.\u201d<\/em>\n<\/p>\n Next, O\u2019Keefe asked if he could vouch for at least five people. Poll workers confirmed this, but specified that he could actually vouch for up to eight people if needed. <\/em>To this news, O\u2019Keefe responded, \u201cThat\u2019s a good thing,\u201d<\/em> adding that he would go back and \u201cget more people\u201d that he would like to vouch for. Incidentally, O\u2019Keefe never voted or gathered anyone, but he was successful in showing how election workers were willing to carry out the vouching process.\n<\/p>\n Moving onto another polling location, the disguised O\u2019Keefe once again questioned whether he could vouch for unregistered voters, asking, \u201cIs that ok?\u201d<\/em> The worker enthusiastically answered, \u201cYes,\u201d<\/em> explaining, \u201cif you are all in the same precinct and you are already registered, which it looks like you are, then you can vouch for them as ID for them.\u201d <\/em>O\u2019Keefe declared, \u201cOh, good! And no ID needed. I just vouch for them!\u201d<\/em> Smiling, the poll worker reiterated, \u201cYou\u2019re the ID,\u201d <\/em>and further explained that he could vouch for up to eight people. As before, O\u2019Keefe did not actually vote or bring others to do so, but was able to expose the way the faulty rules worked.\n<\/p>\n To those who demand secure and fair elections, these investigations reveal disturbing cracks in an already damaged voting system. Proponents of vouching, however, say that the policy expands ballot access for people who have recently moved as well as senior citizens. Contrarily, critics view it as a way to potentially commit fraud.\n<\/p>\n In his investigation, O\u2019Keefe refers to a document from the Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State, which shows that election workers are only required to circle the number of people who are vouched for by a registered voter, but there\u2019s no identifying information to show who they actually are. Furthermore, Scott Pressler, from Early Vote Action, reveals that when he requested lists of vouched-for voters from areas of Minnesota such as Duluth, St. Paul, Minneapolis, and St. Cloud, he was out of luck. In fact, these voters were \u201cnameless, faceless, and record-less.\u201d\n<\/p>\n O\u2019Keefe maintains that his team\u2019s investigation \u201cwas designed to take the system off the pages of the statute book and put it to an extreme real-world test\u2026undercover reporters repeatedly presented election workers with the same basic scenario: multiple unregistered people, no standard identification, and a registered voter willing to vouch for them.\u201d<\/em>\n<\/p>\n In a video posted on social media O\u2019Keefe stated, \u201cMost poll workers we visited were willing to let us vouch with no questions asked, even when presented with the most absurd situation imaginable, while other poll workers did take issue with our investigation, revealing awareness that something about this vouching process is deeply flawed\u2013yet for some reason, they don\u2019t want us to expose it.\u201d<\/em>\n<\/p>\n At these precincts, O\u2019Keefe and his undercover crew did NOT actually vote. A post on X stressed, \u201cNote: the intention of this video was NEVER to actually vote. The intention was only to expose flaws in the system. No ballots were cast or touched. No affidavits were signed or touched. All we did is speak to poll workers.\u201d<\/em>\n<\/p>\n Even though no votes were cast, O\u2019Keefe and Higby are now under fire for their investigation by the Minnesota chapter of CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations), an organization that has been linked to scandals involving Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. They charge that O\u2019Keefe and Higby misrepresented themselves in the undercover videos and went out of their way to paint Muslims in a bad light. Moreover, the Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon called the investigative team a \u201cwidely discredited Florida-based political group\u201d whose behavior at polling stations was \u201coutrageous.\u201d\n<\/p>\n O\u2019Keefe pointed out the irrational nature of the charges by drawing attention to the most obvious problem\u2013 election workers declared, \u201cYou are the ID.\u201d<\/em> Instead of re-examining Minnesota\u2019s vouching guidelines, which can easily give way to fraud, faultfinders are threatening those who find serious loopholes in the voting system.\n<\/p>\n Social media users who have seen O\u2019Keefe and Higby\u2019s videos have repeatedly expressed concerns over America\u2019s broken election laws, with some urging, \u201cPass the SAVE America Act,\u201d which requires proof of citizenship for voter registration and a photo ID for voting.\n<\/p>\n O\u2019Keefe and Higby aren\u2019t the only ones exposing the voucher schemes. Anthony Rubin of the Muckraker Foundation, a group that works closely with O\u2019Keefe, did their own investigation on Minnesota Primary Day. On August 11, 2026, Rubin walked into a Minneapolis polling location with two men dressed in Muslim garb. He told poll workers that the individuals he was with were alleged members of Hamas who had recently arrived from the Gaza Strip, adding that he was unsure of their citizenship status. Rubin questioned whether he could vouch for them.\n<\/p>\n To Rubin\u2019s shock, the election workers stated, \u201cYou can vouch for up to eight people,\u201d<\/em> while another clarified, \u201cIf you\u2019re vouching for them, you wouldn\u2019t need to show anything.\u201d<\/em> Workers specified that the person doing the vouching \u201cis the documentation.\u201d <\/em>\n<\/p>\n Rubin stressed that in Minnesota\u2019s vouching system, his signature alone would be enough for \u201ca foreign terrorist to vote and participate in Minnesota\u2019s election,\u201d and no ID was needed from the people being vouched for. Even when Rubin expressed concern that he \u201ccould get into trouble\u201d for vouching for alleged members of Hamas, he was assured that it wouldn\u2019t be an issue.\n<\/p>\n Rubin and the men who were pretending to be Hamas members didn\u2019t cast any ballots or sign any oaths, but their video documentation showed that poll workers were ready, willing, and able to follow the clearly unsound Minnesota vouching standards.\n<\/p>\n About a week after the investigations, undercover journalist Cam Higby interviewed a former head election judge in Minneapolis who agreed that the Minnesota voting system has blatant flaws in the vouching system. \u201cThe only requirement is that the person doing the vouching is a registered voter in that precinct,\u201d<\/em> she stated while referring to pages 22- 23 in the 2026 election procedures manual.\n<\/p>\n As the November mid-term elections approach, now is the time to buckle down and pray. Fraudulent schemes are being exposed every day, and this means there are serious problems with election integrity. Intercessors must continue to intercede for every state in our nation, asking for the Lord\u2019s hand to be upon our election supervisors, poll workers, and voters. Pray for corruption to be exposed and for honest individuals and leaders to do what\u2019s right, rather than make excuses when serious loopholes in the system are found.\n<\/p>\n Lord Jesus, we pray for fair, just, and secure elections. Bring all corruption out into the light so that changes can be made where they are needed. We pray for election supervisors, poll workers, and legislators to question guidelines and laws that are clearly unsound. Have mercy on our nation. We need You now more than ever.\n<\/p>\n Angela Rodriguez is an author, blogger, and former teacher who studies the signs of the times, as well as the historical and biblical connections between Israel and the United States. You can visit her blogs at <\/em>67owls.com<\/em> and <\/em>100trumpets.com<\/em>. She is also the author of <\/em>Psalm 91<\/em>: Under the <\/em>Wings<\/em> of Jesus and<\/em> Hallelujah\u2019s<\/em> Great Ride. Photo Credit: Erik (HASH) Hersman from Orlando \u2013 Vote here, vote aqui, CC BY 2.0, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/w\/index.php?curid=76079316)<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Voter fraud is a real problem, especially in states like Minnesota, where scandals have become the norm. Though officials in Minnesota claim their electoral process is reliable and sound, the truth is that there are gaping holes in the framework currently in place. Get prayer updates from IFA. \u00a0 Going Undercover to Uncover Lies Investigative<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":27607,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[1958,3237,3009,5676,10535],"class_list":["post-31624","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-prayer","tag-exposed","tag-laws","tag-minnesota","tag-problem","tag-vouching"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/biblelon.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31624","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/biblelon.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/biblelon.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biblelon.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biblelon.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31624"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/biblelon.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31624\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biblelon.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/27607"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/biblelon.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31624"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biblelon.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31624"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biblelon.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31624"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}No ID? No Problem!<\/h2>\n
You\u2019re the ID!<\/h2>\n
To Vouch or Not To Vouch<\/h2>\n
Investigation Under Fire<\/h2>\n
Hamas Members Can Vote?<\/h2>\n
Pray for the Upcoming Elections in November<\/h2>\n
What do you think of Minnesota\u2019s Vouching Laws? How can we pray about this?<\/h4>\n