As student achievement continues to decline across the nation, a growing debate is emerging over the role of ideology in public education. Critics argue that schools have become increasingly focused on activism and political frameworks while academic performance suffers.
This content is supported by your donations.
Give today.
From City Journal:
The United States has entered a “learning recession,” according to a new Education Scorecard report. Nationally, eighth-grade reading scores now stand at their lowest point since 1990, and fourth-grade reading has fallen back to pre-2003 levels. Only 31 percent of American fourth-grade students are proficient.
California’s results were similarly dismal. Yet this news doesn’t seem to be ringing any alarm bells in Sacramento. As the school year wrapped up, the state’s Department of Education was busy sponsoring a training for K–12 teachers that encouraged them to “take action” to transform schools into “liberatory systems.”
Such trainings are no aberration. Activism and ideology, not student performance, are priorities not just in California but also in many other states.
The article points to changes that accelerated after the passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act in 2015, which shifted more authority over accountability and teacher quality standards to individual states. According to critics, many states used that authority to embed concepts known as culturally responsive education (CRE) throughout teacher licensing requirements, professional development programs, and educator preparation standards.
Supporters of culturally responsive education argue that it helps teachers better understand students from diverse backgrounds and create more inclusive classrooms. Opponents, however, contend that some state frameworks go beyond cultural awareness and encourage educators to view society through ideological lenses that emphasize oppression, systemic bias, and political activism.
The debate has implications far beyond individual classrooms. States including California, Illinois, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania require educators to demonstrate competency in culturally responsive education as part of licensure requirements. Critics argue that these mandates shape the entire teacher pipeline, from university training programs to professional development courses.
The author suggests that lawmakers should review and potentially revise these requirements while placing greater emphasis on teaching students how to engage thoughtfully with controversial issues. Rather than encouraging activism, schools could focus on helping students evaluate evidence, understand competing viewpoints, and participate in respectful civic discourse.
The discussion raises important questions about the purpose of education. Schools play a vital role in preparing the next generation not only academically, but also as citizens capable of discerning truth, thinking critically, and engaging others with wisdom and respect. As educational outcomes continue to decline, many are calling for renewed attention to the fundamentals of learning and character formation.
Share your prayers and scriptures for America’s students, teachers, and education leaders below.
(Excerpt from City Journal. Photo Credit: Kenny Eliason on Unsplash)
